Friday, April 13, 2018

2001: A Space Odyssey 1968 directed by Stanley Kubrick

2001 is one of the most influential films ever made and will soon get a re-release in 4k for it's 50th anniversary.  It's visuals are striking and 50 years later they still hold up despite being done at time long before digital effects existed. It's non traditional story telling keeps people guessing as to the "true meaning" of certain elements  of the film and the soundtrack, though pretty much all classical music,  has become symbolic of the future we have in outer space. It was selected for preservation by the National Film Registry in 1991.

The story, though told unconventionally, isn't all that complicated in essence. Extraterrestrials have been promoting human evolution and development since they roamed the plains as primitive apes - prodding them to use use tools ( for violence at first) and take the first steps towards intelligence. This is done trough a totally black and smooth monolith which appears out of nowhere. Jumping thousands of of years later in one of the most iconic jump cuts in film history, a group of scientists on the moon have discovered another monolith, deliberately buried there which emits a signal toward Jupiter. A ship is sent to Jupiter where it discovers another monolith near the planet which opens a star gate, apparently taking the astronaut to wherever the aliens are and returning him... or some version of him maybe back to Earth int he form a "star child" who might represent the next stage in human evolution.

Fair to say, the actual plot of the film is secondary to the effect it has on the viewer and how it changed sci-fi and cinema after it's release. Never before had so much care been taken to realistically show the future in space. Some might say no one has ever put that much car into it again. The effort pays off and everything from the way we see travel to the space station, the moon and beyond is still not only believable but pretty accurate for a movie made before man had even set foot on the moon.

The realistic presentation of technology made a huge impact. Spaceships and alien encounters aside, the character of HAL, a super computer that proves to have  mind of it's own, has become the poster child for tech and artificial intelligence gone wrong. This is unfair to HAL, I would argue, as his actions though severe (I think killing almost the entire crew as they sleep counts as severe) are not totally beyond comprehension. HAL has become emotionally unbalanced because he was told to keep information from the crew, something that leads him to think the crew can not be trusted with such an important mission. The sequel 2010 goes into this in more detail, but the seeds are planted here. When HAL tell the last living crew member "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I am not able to do that", it's terrifying.

To be sure, the film goes into complete mind-fuck mode by the end as the sole survivor disconnects HAL and leave the ship to meet up with the monolith. A mind blowing psychedelic display later, he seems to go through the rest of his life in minutes, and solitude, only to be transformed into the star child which heads back to earth. How someone reacts to all this is dependent on each person's personality and beliefs - and possibly what drugs they took before entering the theatre.

Like most Kubrick films , this one had some people loving it while others hated it with a burning passion. It did quite well on release and became not just a cult classic, but a true classic of modern film. It won an Oscar for best special effects but lost to Planet of the Apes for make-up, leading many to think that it was overlooked in the category because the apes in Kubrick's film were so real, academy members thought they were. The techniques uses in the film are revolutionary. On example is the use of font projection over matte work. This meant that instead of tracing an element and adding it to another piece of film (leading to that black line seen in many effects shot of the period) it used a giant super reflective screen that had an image projected on to it so the camera could film both the foreground action and the affects backdrops at the same time with seamless realism. In fact, even the outdoor shots on the African plains were all done in doors. The designs of everything form the ships to the clothing to the zero gravity toilet hold up to this day. Even though we have now been to the moon, have a space station or two and have sent probes to the other planets - none of that seems as real as some of the stuff we see in this movie.


T' said...

This is THE year for this movie, and likely I will watch it again and think. It's arguably his best film made with his categoric precision and with less of his crazed perfectionism of later films. Of those I've seen of his, this is my favorite. Films don't make you think any more. This one certainly does. And then some.

Behemoth media said...

I like quite a few of his films to different degrees. This one is in my wheelhouse for sure more than most of the others. I love Killer's Kiss his first and appreciate Barry Lyndon visually. I liked Eye ice Shut as we talked about recently and would have liked AI a lot more (even if it technically not his film) if it had ended 15 minutes earlier with the robot child forever looking a the statue of the Blue Fairy underwater for eternity. The Shining strayed from the book but really has impact too I think.

T' said...

Don't like "The Shining," because from the moment we see him, I don't believe Jack is anything but a crazy person. I think he was terribly miscast. Sure, he does the wacko great, but this part called for someone able to portray a normal person driven over the edge. With that much telegraphing the movie kind of ruins its impact. Other than that, it's got some great scenes and certainly has inspired some elaborate conspiracy theories! "Barry Lyndon" I have but haven't watched. "Eyes" I'm still working on, though I think it's rather flawed. Only seen "Dr. Strangelove" once, at the old Harvard Square theater. I think he is really interesting as a person and a filmmaker. Have to determine if all his perfectionism was worth it or not.

Behemoth media said...

Kubrick's precise style of filmmaking could just be a big urn off to you, it's not for everyone. As for jack Nicholson, I have to agree and I think he is the weak link in the Shining, too over the top too fast and for too much of the movie. Strangelove I like a lot... the president is named President Merkin! Do yourself a favour and look up what a merkin is if you don't know already!

T' said...

I don't think his precise style is a turn off. I think it's fascinating because you don't feel ANY of that on screen. I read an article that talked about the trials in filming "Eyes Wide Shut," and I would never have known that it took that long or was that much a pain in the ass. Hell, I thought the two leads were just high all the time! Could be he's just uneven. Most people are. I'll have to take each movie on its own.